There are words that are used to trigger emotions and cloud the mind. They are designed to temporarily brutalize the critical faculties of intellect, anche se rimangono foneticamente vivaci e capaci di suscitare una risposta emotiva in chi le ascolta, le sue connotazioni semantiche sono state parzialmente o completamente cambiate, dall' emittente che propaga il messaggio. Il nostro lessico corrente contiene molte parole e frasi appositamente progettate per una bella visuale e ottenere una "morale" di sostegno a specifici progetti politici o ideologici. Il suo obiettivo finale è la creazione del consenso, il presupposto della "democrazia".
L'uso di strumenti linguistici di persuasione è uno degli aspetti più sofisticati della cosiddetta "guerra psicologica", cioè, di operazioni psicologiche lanciate dai governi, soprattutto in tempi di guerra o di crisi [1]. Ma la guerra is also part of the psychological basis of communication and journalism of the "public discourse". Since we all use the tool of language, the code is essential for
make it unnecessary to define all its phonemes, thus facilitating the exchange of ideas. However, there are people whose sole job is to turn words into weapons and tools of propaganda function. We know from experience that the Israeli Hasbara is organized in such a way that builds consensus through continuous repetition of their indiscriminate rhetoric and support them in favor of Israel [2].
This language, artificially changed, is steeped in so meticulous in contemporary Western thought that the Orwellian Ministry of Truth has become a prediction of what they do every day in Israel in the Ministry of Hasbara and in all its ramifications more or less official distributed worldwide. When you look at the news during the evening, almost no longer feel effect of acts committed against civilian populations living under military occupation: war crimes in any case shall communicate as if they were legitimate and necessary actions, or even for humanitarian purposes. Those same atrocities circulating disguised as essential actions for peace and coexistence, and the human suffering caused is hidden or denied. However, when the suffering of victim is a western or belongs "in the same area Democrat, is set in motion the opposite mechanism, so who knows how to arouse our moral indignation. We are customer submitted the Western media, whose information is already fully digested and there sembrebbero repugnant if the tables are turned and instead of being the perpetrators, are the victims.
Those who write and compile reports provide more intrinsic value to the life of an ally and collect information in a way that reinforces this tendency polarized thinking in political thought. When a soldier dies the West is glorified as a hero, no matter where he was or what he did at the time of death, and so does israelti even if they occupy the territories subject to "ethnic cleansing" of the population is not Jewish. When it is stated the objective of any violent action, the moral stature that is given is proportional to its proximity to the image we have of ourselves. If the victims belong to the "bad", they expect that you almost feel relief and have a shot of patriotism with the implicit message that "the good has prevailed." At the same time, we would expect from him on the side of those who live in Sderot, we felt that their difficulties, their attitude "arrogant" and the nervousness of their cats of course, as our primary concern. During the siege of Gaza, the media give the same amount of information and assign the same gravity to a group of teenagers who complain of their confinement between school, home and shelter to Palestinian parents desperate to destroy their homes and delegate the killing of their children by soldiers and Israeli bombs. Equivalence of suffering so disproportionate as it would be absurd in any context, but what they claim is that these reports do not flinch when one looks at them.
Likewise, expect the acceptance on our part, the Israeli justification that their army is "the most moral of the whole world", regardless of the photos that leaked from the hell of Gaza. The Israeli premier has tried di placare le denunce internazionali con le seguenti parole: "L'esercito israeliano, con una morale senza precedenti, si è gelosamente interessato ad agire in conformità con il diritto internazionale e ha fatto tutto il possibile per evitare eventuali danni ai civili non coinvolti in combattimento, e le loro proprietà. A tal fine, tra l'altro, decise di lanciare dal cielo molte schede esplicative e usò i media e la rete telefonica locale [3], per avvertire in anticipo e in dettaglio la popolazione civile. L'esercito israeliano si è inoltre impegnato a farsi carico dei bisogni umanitari della popolazione civile durante i combattimenti nella Striscia di Gaza. "[4]
Lasciando da parte i giudizi di valore inerente a tale dichiarazione, secondo la quale l'esercito israeliano è di una morale unica, la stampa nascose il contenuto delle schede esplicative "umanitarie" ed evitò qualsiasi spiegazione sul "uso" dei media e rete telefonica locale. Le schede avvertivano la gente - che erano in trappola e senza scampo- della distruzione a cui andavano incontro "se non andavano via". Ciò dimostra l'intenzione premeditata di causare danni e la minaccia di morte e distruzione di beni civili. Per quanto riguarda le telefonate, un articolo di USA Today ha dichiarato che i palestinesi hanno ricevuto chiamate sia ai loro telefoni cellulari sia a quelli fissi, in cui venivano avvertiti che le loro case sarebbe stato bombardate. E 'stato impossibile risalire o bloccare tali chiamate, perché provenienti da compagnie telefoniche internazionali. Secondo i funzionari israeliani, non era altro che un servizio reso ai palestinesi (prima del vero e proprio "servizio" è ovvio), ma il comandante Jacob Dallal, un portavoce dell'esercito, ha rifiutato di rivelare il modo in cui ottennero i numeri di cellulare di Gaza (non esistono elenchi telefonici di questi numeri).
L"'uso" dei media locali è dovuto all'entrata forzata dell'esercito israeliano nelle immagini di Al Aqsa TV e nelle frequenze delle stazioni radio, comprese quella di Hamas, il FPLP e la Jihad islamica. Secondo Abu Kamal Nasser, al momento della diffusione del Voice di Gerusalemme, l'esercito israeliano interrompe il segnale per più di un'ora al giorno per recapitare messaggi accusando Hamas di tutti i problemi di Gaza. Queste affermazioni sono corroborate da molti abitanti di Gaza che si basavano sulla radio come unico legame con il mondo esterno e, loro malgrado, sono stati bombardati di propaganda dagli stessi che lanciavano bombe sulle loro teste.
Le avvertenze dettagliate e gli aiuti umanitari sono anche facili da confutare. L'esercito israeliano non ha nemmeno informato i medici sul tipo di armi usate o come trattare le strane ferite che queste producono, tipiche degli esplosivi di metallo inerte e fosforo bianco. Come tutti sanno ormai, la Striscia di Gaza ha subito un blocco totale di terra, mare e aria è unicamente sono rimasti permeabili i tunnel sottoterranei nel confine con il Sinai. Both the Israelis and the Americans have not been slow to claim that these were used for the "smuggling of weapons," and not as the only road access to essential goods, since the border had been closed by Israel and Egypt and where they remained stationed security forces loyal to Fatah. The reading of any declaration of Israel always takes a great effort. The truth is, but it is distorted by what they express their words. However, such statements are accepted without question and also reach a humanitarian status.
We take for the blind, deaf and dumb people who write or broadcast or is this really are all that and more? The fact of living as privileged beings on this planet, "off the axis of evil" prevents us from seeing how others see us and frees us from the feeling of disgust for the importance that we believe we have and contempt that we show to others? We have become the monsters that will surely seem insensitive or are we only now we have been indoctrinated and brainwashed to lock our critical faculties?
Since the media can not censor or prevent it all fits to the surface, controlling offering covers the canonical interpretation of events, which we accept as "fact" or "the truth. If we are still able view, the goal of experts is to avoid Hasbara to make us think. Therefore, messages that arouse fear and phrases slogans are always at hand. We save you the effort of our brain. We feel "informed", but without speech or thought (in fact, harmful thing for them). And when we stopped thinking, we remain silent about violence used to oppress the weak.
Totalitarian regimes have always depended dalll'ignoranza or fear, to consolidate and maintain its influence over those who otherwise would rebel against. The same seems to happen in "democracies" of today. We pressure them and Islamic charities accused of terrorist group that is fighting against the occupation, while diplomatic relations depend on the approval of those who control the strings of the money. We establish conditions that explicitly prohibit support for political movements or governments that maintain a critical view of the Zionist state, as if this were the criterion that disqualifies an entire people in the global arena. In short, even a democracy ("demonocrazia?) Practice a powerful indoctrination designed to inculcate their own advantage in terms of hegemony, economic or even moral. Means are used, both in the information in 'entertainment, brainwashed with the to configure a model of "good citizen", so that the company overwhelmingly supports any political government to defend. The effects are felt up and down in all social strata, even in our children, who expected to uncritically hail the "heroes of peace" armed to the teeth in Afghanistan and Iraq. After all, it seems that Orwell was right.
The fight against empty rhetoric, deconstruction of the lies and the regaining of our critical thinking are no longer a luxury but must become an absolute necessity. In order to contribute to this awareness, Tlaxcala and Palestine Think Tank today lanciamno an international campaign, focused on testing of analytical deconstruction of many of these terms and phrases, as a first step to building a lexicon alternative with a more complete reading of the words at present exercising their siege against of us as instruments of propaganda emotional. We ask our authors, partners, members and affiliates to reflect and write on these issues and also invite readers to work with original works for publication, translation and dissemination.
What words we are interested in - worry? There are many to choose from, so we left to the discretion of the writers. We have no desire to limit the evidence to one for each item selected, it is possible for those who want to contribute opinions or arguments. We hope that this effort of international cooperation can contribute to a better understanding of world events and a greater awareness of how we can actively influence in this effort, not only with the rejection of the flawed definitions that seek to impose on us, but filling in the words of content and unraveling their true size.
Notes [1] http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guerra_psicol B3gica
[2] http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hasbar A1% C3%
[3 ] http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Government/Communiques/2009/IDF_warns_Gaza_population_7-Jan-2009.htm
[4] http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Government/Communiques / 2009/Humanitarian_aid_to_Gaza_following_6_month_calm.htm
Source in the original language: http://www.tlaxcala.es/pp.asp?reference=8844&lg=en
0 comments:
Post a Comment